The March on Freedom
The March on Freedom
"What is the price of a decent man and patriot in the present? They're ambivalent and saddened. They occasionally make appeals however they are not that is decisive and efficient. They hope, with good intentions that someone else will fix the problem to ensure that there is no more sorrow for them. They are, at best, sacrificing just a token vote with a small amount of support and hope for a good outcome in the direction that they perceive it. " Henry David Thoreau For more detail please visit>>> https://www.enewsway.com https://dignitywave.com/ https://themartinnews.com/ https://healthcareaide.net/ https://editorialge.com/ https://kitknock.com/ https://cbdvalues.com/ https://sobhawindsor-whitefield.com/ Henry David Thoreau in his essay "On the Obligation of Civil Disobedience" supported the idea of disobedience to an unjust government. The ideas he formulated were influenced by Mahatma Gandhi, as well as his minister Martin Luther King Jr. who advocated for disobedience and protest in a non-violent manner. Strikes, symbolic protests the boycott of certain products and refusing to make payments (see tax, tolls, etc.).) are peaceful ways of resisting and civil non-violence. The majority of the time the peaceful struggle takes place independent of the current political system and requires massive mobilization. Based on research findings, the major peace initiatives were more successful than violent resistance campaigns. A massive mobilization was also achieved through the ministry of Martin Luther King Jr. on August 28, 1963, through his March on Washington which saw 250,000 people took part. Gandhi was able to mobilize his people due to the fact that he formulated the idea of independence for Indians. Indians against the British colonialists. The vision that Gandhi formulated, and which also been incorporated into Gandhi's ongoing instructions, has been successful in creating social harmony with the Indian people, and in reducing the social divide in India. In the March of this year the King delivered his famous "I Have A dream" speech. Martin Luther King was arrested and wrote his well-known "Letter From Birmingham" where King called for civil disobedience against laws that were unjust. The Kennedy government was aware of the tense situation that had developed and, in 1964, it passed the Human Rights Law passed. It is crucial to remember that, as per analysts that the issue was not caused by those who were against the rights of blacks rather by moderates who demanded restraint, thereby leading to the rise of the brutal resistance of blacks i.e. Black Panthers. This is in the spirit of the words of Thoreau said: "Those who, while disapproving of the nature and actions of a government, offer the government their support and submission are, without doubt, its most devoted supporters, and therefore tend to be the biggest obstructions to reform ". The success of resistance campaigns is when they are massive, receive the support of security forces and civil servants, and should, if they can, receive international support, but only from respected organizations that do not damage the credibility of the campaign. The support of mass media is equally important and was the case for Martin Luther King Jr. The March on Washington that was extensively reported in the press. If media outlets fail to assist in the delivery of impartial information and the right technology, then the "weight" is placed on voice of the independent i.e. on the Internet blogs, portals, blogs and alternative YouTube channels and social media channels. Peace activists also stress the importance of disseminating educational materials (books brochures, DVDs, books and so on.) which informs the public about the outcomes of peaceful campaigns in the past. The activists emphasize that this is crucial to mobilize the masses, specifically education and information (Gandhi's example of continuous instruction is proof of this). We live in a time of economics in which democracy is fading to benefit the global financial industry. Autocratic regimes are trying to suppress peaceful protests through Internet surveillance, as well with other methods such as the oppression of people through laws that are prohibitive and sometimes, even jailing citizens. Does the modern-day citizen accept it , or is he/she so disenchanted that he/she doesn't resist any longer? What is the reason there isn't an organization that has a vision and is able to mobilize the people? Could it be because leaders are equally disengaged? Does it make sense to hope for leadership when the social movements around the globe are vast and not governed by anyone? The issues arising from the absence of peaceful mobilization and civil disobedience are numerous and it is interesting to explore them further to discover the answer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.