"Ah however, it's Digital Now". "Digital" is a term whose origins are in the latin digitalis, which comes from the Latin word the Latin word digitus ("finger or toe") but now its usage is usually associated with televisions, computers cameras, music players and watches and on. But what about digital money or even democracy in the digital age? The printing press was revolution at the time it was seen as a powerful force for democracy and the good of many. It was the first time that books were accessible to everyone. could be considered a revolutionary development, today, we have e-books as well as technological devices to read them. The truth that the words originally written are encoded in an electronic format and then converted back into words electronically doesn't mean that we are able to trust less the text that we are reading, but we could still appreciate the physical look of a book to a piece high-tech plastic that has to be charged in order to function. Do digital currencies like bitcoin actually contribute to social change in as dramatic as a manner? To answer this, we need to consider what is money and how can we understand it, utilize it and integrate the concept into an enduring system of a better future for all? The concept of money, which is unlike any other type of asset, is distinct in the sense that it can be used for any purpose prior to any event happening. It has no meaning, yet it can be used to accomplish great good or for great evil, but it remains what it is, despite its various manifestations and consequences. Visit:- https://www.puridge.co.jp/media/ It is a singular however, it is a under-appreciated and misinterpreted commodity. It has the convenience of facilitating the buying and selling of goods, as well as the mathematical complexity demonstrated through the markets for financial services but it does not have any concept of egalitarianism or moral decisions. It is an independent entity, but it is both exogenous and endogenous to the world. It is not a person and is easily replaced, but it is regarded like a resource that is finite within the global context, with its development governed by a set of complicated rules that define how it behaves. But the results are not always predictable in addition, an adherence to social justice and aversion to morality isn't required for its usage. For the currency to be able to fulfill the financial tasks required for it to be effective, the intrinsic value of money must be accepted as a fact among those who utilize it. In November 2013, the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs recognized it was true that virtual currency is legal method of paying and one example is Bitcoin. Due to the extremely low transaction costs that are charged by the Bitcoin network this is a authentic way to facilitate the transfer of money from migrants who send money to their families, without being required to pay for the huge transfer fees that are currently charged by corporations. The European Commission calculated that if the average worldwide remittance of 10% were cut to five percent (the 5x5 initiative, which was endorsed in G20 in 2011). G20 during 2011) This could lead to an increase of US$17 billion flowing to developing nations; the blockchain's use would cut these costs to close to zero. The companies involved in money transfer that take advantage of the system to gain wealth might be able to disengage themselves through the use of this infrastructure. Perhaps the most significant thing to be aware of about cryptocurrencies is the decentralised and distributed network. With the rapid growth of the Internet it is possible that we are only seeing the tip of an iceberg' with regards to future developments that could unlock unexplored potential for creating decentralisation, but on an previously unimaginable or unseen size. In the past the time in the past, when there was a requirement for a massive network, it could only be achieved through an hierarchical structure, with the consequence of releasing the power of the network to a select group of people who have a monopoly interest. It is possible to say that Bitcoin is the result of dispersal of money and the transition to a more simple approach to system. Bitcoin is the same significant advancement as peer-to-peer file sharing or internet telephones (Skype for instance).). There isn't much specific legal regulations regarding virtual or digital currency, but there's many applicable laws to a country's legal financial framework, including taxation, Banking and Money Transmitting Regulation, Securities Regulation, Criminal or civil law Consumer Rights/Protection, Pensions Regulation, Commodities and stocks regulation and many more. Therefore, the two major concerns with bitcoin is whether it is regarded as legal tender, and as an asset, it's considered property. It is a common customary for nations to clearly declare currency to be legal tender of a different nation-state (e.g. US$) which prevents the recognition of other currencies officially as currencies. An exception is Germany which permits the notion of a 'unit of account' that could thus be used as an alternative to 'private money' and is used in'multilateral clearing circles. Another reason for being considered property, the main difference is that, in contrast to the property of a digital currency, digital currencies have the ability to be divided into smaller quantities. Open economies that are developed and open to trade are generally open to digital currencies. The USA has issued the highest instructions and is well illustrated by the following map. Capital-controlled economies are by definition hostile or conflicting. In the case of several African and some other nations, this issue is not yet addressed. Beginning with the principles of participation in democracy, it's obvious that bitcoin doesn't meet its positive impact on society element of this goal in the sense that its value is not something that it has the power to influence however it is subject to market forces. But any cryptocurrency that is 'new' might allow democratic participation if the cryptocurrency has distinct rules of governance and issuing that is based on more socially-based democratic principles.